Books:

Book cover for Philosophy in a Technological World

Inner Space Philosophy

Coming Soon!

Book cover for Philosophy in a Technological World

Philosophy in a Technological World:

Gods and Titans

Philosophy has come to seem like a specialist interest with little or no influence on our lives. On the contrary, argues James Tartaglia, it was the philosophy of materialism which taught us to turn from the gods to seek practical assistance from the titans, thereby reversing the moral of an ancient Greek myth to inspire the building of today’s technological world. As the largely unreflected belief-system it has now become, materialism continues to steer the direction of technological development, while making us think this direction is inevitable. By drawing on neglected idealist traditions of philosophy, Tartaglia argues for a new way of looking at reality which asserts our freedom to choose, reaffirms and builds upon our ordinary, everyday understanding, and motivates us to convert technological innovation into a process driven by public rationality and consent. With discussions ranging from consciousness, determinism and personal identity, to post-truth culture, ego-death and video games, this clear and accessible book will be of wide interest.


Book cover for Philosophy in a Meaningless Life

Philosophy in a Meaningless Life:

A System of Nihilism, Consciousness and Reality

This book provides an account of the nature of philosophy which is rooted in the question of the meaning of life. It makes the case for believing that this question is neither obscure nor obsolete, but reflects a quintessentially human concern to which other traditional philosophical problems can be readily related, allowing them to be reconnected with natural interest, and providing a diagnosis of the typical lines of opposition across philosophy’s debates. Tartaglia looks at the various ways philosophers have tried to avoid the conclusion that life is meaningless, and in the process have distanced philosophy from the concept of transcendence. Rejecting all of this, Tartaglia embraces nihilism (‘we are here with nothing to do’), and uses transcendence both to provide a new solution to the problem of consciousness, and to explain away perplexities about time and universals.


Book cover for A Defence of Nihilism

A Defence of Nihilism

Sample

Nihilism has received a grossly misleading press, in our view. Far from being a problem that needs to be overcome, we will argue that it is an insightful and morally anodyne philosophical outlook on the world; one which allows us to take a cosmic perspective on our lives without making religious presuppositions. As such, our objective in this short book will be to rehabilitate nihilism’s public image. If we can achieve this, we think a significant barrier of misunderstanding between religious believers and atheists will have been removed.


Book cover for The Meaning of Life and The Great Philosophers

The Meaning of Life and The Great Philosophers

This book reveals how great philosophers of the past sought to answer the question of the meaning of life. It contains thirty-five chapters which each focus on a major philosophical figure, from Confucius to Rorty, to imaginatively engage with the topic from that philosopher’s perspective. This volume also contains a Postscript (‘The Blue Flower’), co-written with Stephen Leach, on the historical origins and original significance of the phrase ‘the meaning of life’.


Book cover for Nihilism and the Meaning of Life

Nihilism and the Meaning of Life:

A Philosophical Dialogue with James Tartaglia

Complete Text

Ten philosophers reflect on Tartaglia’s Philosophy in a Meaningless Life. Contains the author’s replies and a new essay entitled 'Nihilism and the Meaning of Life'.


Book cover for Consciousness and the GreatPhilosophers

Consciousness and the Great Philosophers

This book addresses the question of how the great philosophers of the past might have reacted to the contemporary problem of consciousness. Each of the thirty-two chapters within this edited collection focuses on a major philosophical figure from the history of philosophy, from Anscombe to Xuanzang, and imaginatively engages with the problem from their perspective.


Book cover for Mind, Language, and Metaphilosophy: Early Philosophical Papers

Mind, Language, and Metaphilosophy:

Early Philosophical Papers

Sample

This volume presents a selection of essays which Richard Rorty wrote during the first decade of his career (1961-72). The introduction examines Rorty's philosophical development during this period.


Book cover for Richard Rorty: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers

Richard Rorty:

Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers

Sample

A four-volume survey of Rorty scholarship, with the articles organised by theme. Contains my essay ‘Are Causal Pressures part of the Way the World Is?’


Book cover for Rorty & The Mirror of Nature Alternative cover for Rorty & The Mirror of Nature

Rorty and the Mirror of Nature

Sample

Explains Rorty’s Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), chapter by chapter; contains plenty of criticism, too.


Journal Papers & Book Chapters:

PDF
Written in 2018 (while I was working on Gods and Titans), I try to explain Rorty’s awkward combination of pragmatism and materialism by reference to his views on technology.

PDF
Written in 2015 (just after Philosophy in a Meaningless Life), I take a very hard line on Rorty’s position on consciousness, as well as the various materialist trends that inspired it.

PDF
Written in 2015, I take a fresh and more critical look at Rorty’s  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, following my 2007 treatment in Rorty and the Mirror of Nature.

PDF
In this paper, I reject illusionism (eliminative materialism) and defend the idealist theory of consciousness to be found in Philosophy in a Meaningless Life and  Gods and Titans. I had to squint to say that my theory was itself a kind of non-materialist illusionism, but did so to fit the occasion (a symposium on illusionism). Illusionism, the most hard-line and evidently untenable of all materialist positions on consciousness, is the only consistent materialist position on this issue, in my view. Illusionism is important because it clearly shows what is wrong with materialism.

PDF
A defence of my generalist conception of philosophy, according to which the subject is held together by the meaning of life – this issue is ‘the keystone of philosophy’, as I put it in Philosophy in a Meaningless Life.

PDF
A development of my opposition to philosophers telling people how to make their lives more meaningful.

PDF
Rorty took some of his main ideas from Kant, despite the fact that he was generally opposed to Kantianism in all its forms.

PDF
Thaddeus Metz’s Meaning in Life (2013) has become the main inspiration for philosophers who want to side-line the traditional issue of the meaning of life and instead focus on using conceptual analysis, guided by thought experiments, to try to find a formula for how to live a maximally meaningful life. I regret the stroppy tone of this piece, but it does bring out some fundamental flaws to any project of this kind – irresolvable ones, I think, although the project continues unabated.

PDF
The existence of non-Western philosophy is a problem for Rorty’s conception of philosophy, and indeed, the whole of his project. I look at his evasive attempts to side-line this issue.

PDF
This is the paper I should have published when I finished my Ph.D. in 2001; I did try with its ancestors, but the journals weren’t having it. It is the materialist theory of consciousness I defended in my Ph.D., back when I was struggling to understand how materialism could possibly be true. I gave up in 2004 when I realised that materialism isn’t true. The fact that I published this paper so long after the event was entirely due to career pressures, produced by the quantity of time I spent working on  Philosophy in a Meaningless Life – time which was invisible from the perspective of my CV. It is now best construed as a thought experiment: what is the best that can be done with materialism? The position presented here ultimately collapses into eliminativism, for reasons I explain in chapter 4 of Philosophy in a Meaningless Life.

PDF
I think it does. The best, most succinct statement of this problem, together with the social context that lends the issue interest, is to be found in chapter 8 of  Gods and Titans.

PDF
This was my first attempt to link J.J. Valberg’s Horizonal conception of consciousness with virtual reality. I continued with this theme in chapters 7 and 8 of  Gods and Titans.

PDF
This is my earliest treatment of the generalist conception of philosophy later defended in Philosophy in a Meaningless Life. The fact that philosophy exists in a conceptual space between religion and science strikes me as one of its greatest sources of contemporary social significance, one which is currently being largely wasted.

PDF
I defend and develop Hilary Putnam’s objection that Rorty’s philosophy undermines itself.

PDF
Rorty thought that neither consciousness (experiential feel) nor intentionality (experiential direction) could provide ‘the mark of the mental’, i.e. something which explains why mental states are grouped together and contrasted with the physical. In this paper, I argued that only the notion of introspection can do the job.

Magazine Articles:

PDF
This piece is about teleportation (see chapter 7 of Gods and Titans); the title comes from a jazz composition by Charles Mingus.

PDF
Steve Leach and I did a lot of research to find the historical origins of the phrase ‘the meaning of life’. This is a popular version of the essay that resulted, ‘The Blue Flower’, which was published in The Meaning of Life and the Great Philosophers (and is linked from the entry for the book on this website). However this magazine version does contain some interesting extra material that didn’t make it into the main essay, suggesting that perhaps the phrase originated with Goethe rather than Novalis.

PDF
No, we are not – that’s the short answer.

PDF
This is about the distinction between the meaning of life and the question of how to give our lives social meaning (meaning IN life).